There Are Many Definitions Of The Word Blindness In The Dictionary. Tw

There are many definitions of the word blindness in the dictionary. Two of them pertain to the story about Oedipus and Teiresias. Both of the men are blind, but they each possess a different type of blindness. The type of blindness possessed by Oedipus is probably worse than the type of blindness possessed by Teiresias. Blindness, as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary, can mean one of two things. The first definition is sightless or complete loss of sight. The second definition is the inability or unwillingness to perceive or understand. This definition would be used in a sentence as: one's blindness to another's faults. When I think of the word blindness I think of it in two respects. The first way is just not being able to see; this is the type of blindness Helen Keller had. The second way is someone being unwilling to realize something they know will make them unhappy. I think that the second way can probably be a lot worse than the first because it may make a person extremely frustrated. Even though the first definition may also frustrate some people, they could learn to live with their physical blindness. An emotional blindness would be a lot harder to deal with. Oedipus acts very blindly in this story. He does not let himself realize that he caused Laius' death. He never even lets the thought enter his mind until it is forced upon him. It is very hard to believe that a king would never inquire about the preceding king's death, especially if he is married to that king's wife. Oedipus obviously does not give it too much thought. Oedipus also becomes physically blind, but this physical blindness is caused by his emotional blindness. His blindness on the outside can not change the blindness on the inside. Teiresias is physically blind, but unlike Oedipus, is aware of the what problems are surrounding him. He knows what the outcome will be if he reveals his knowledge of Laius' killer to the people of Thebes and their rulers. Teiresias shows great strength of character to be able to say no to the person who rules him, even if it is for Oedipus' own good. Teiresias does not speak because he knows it is for the good of the people of Thebes and for King Oedipus. The type of blindness possessed by Oedipus is probably worse than the blindness possessed by Teiresias. This is because Teiresias can perceive and understand things much better than Oedipus. It most likely makes Teiresias very content, while Oedipus may be very frustrated at not being able to comprehend things as he should be able to.

Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essays

Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essays Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essay Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essay It Is Important to note that both toes had experience of war and that as such we cannot comment on differences relating from distance to the sub]etc_ Owens poem Is a story of a gas attack In the First World War. Using pathetic fallacy (ewe cursed through sludge) and negative language he sets up a scene of sheer horror. He begins by describing their weary march. He describes them using language like bent double, asleep and knock- kneed. This immediately gives the impression of fatigue, and he goes on to use negative language such as blood-shod, lame and blind to convey the dire straits which they are in. The poem is in Iambic Pentameter which is very rhythmic and emphasizes the last syllable of each line which is often used in rhyme, as in this poem (even though enjambment takes away the full emphasis). He uses enjambment and plosive language to emphasis particular ideas such as beggar and flares. These both change the rhythm in either speed or rhythm. The rhythm is indeed slow at first and this causes the reader to mull over what Owen is saying. However in the second stanza the rhythm picks up to articulate the sudden rush of a gas attack. Owen uses a mix of quickening language and words with short syllables to peed the stanza up such as Quick! Quick! and Ecstasy. This contrasts with Brocks poem which maintains a steady rhythm throughout the poem, this tone makes it feel very Instructional and dry. Brock, in his poem, talks about various deferent forms of warfare and killing in a very cold and instructional sort of way. Brock alludes to Christ, and to the decreasingly barbaric ways of killing men that have developed. Brock also refers to gas over one verse during his poem, however he does not concentrate on it as Owen does. This also speaks of the deference of background teen the two authors; Brock was a navy sailor during the Second World War, while Owen was a rifleman during the First World War. Brock, In part to emphasis the brutal efficiency of his poem, does not use pathetic fallacy. Brock also uses enjambment, especially between lines (never between verses this causes an uninterrupted rhythm throughout the poem. Both poems portray war very differently: however they both seem to think that the terms death and war are synonymous. This may be classed as simply the shared view of two veterans of war: however this could also be seen as a means to the ends of thwarting war. Having said this Owen does not say that they are as closely linked as Brock does. Owen sets up teen poem as set In war Ana teen uses tenant as alter teen conclusion to teen story, or as, at least, a means to the end. Owen makes it very clear that war is responsible for this death: in the rush, one man clumsily drops his mask, and the narrator sees the man floundering like a man in fire or lime. Owen then talks about how he has to throw the man into the back of a wagon and the mans hanging face, like a devils sick of sin. Owen contrasts the idea of drowning as a peaceful death with his reality f it: He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning. There is also some very strong imagery here: As under a green sea, and He plunges at me. Note that plunge is a plosive word and is therefore emphasized. This is also true as with flung in the next verse. It is however the last verse that speaks the most about death. It uses much negative imagery to bring its point about such as: devils sick of sin, and froth- corrupted lungs. This makes the poem very powerful in the point that it is trying to bring about. He also makes the reader Join the battle, as it were, by stating: If in mothering dreams you coul d pace, this allows the reader to really connect with this. In Brooks poem the poet speaks of death and war as the same thing. The title is quite significant in this theme: Five Wap to Kill a Man, and he goes on to describe various forms of warfare. Brock speaks of death in an increasingly clinical way; this signifies the loss of humanity in war. It begins by speaking of crucifixion where you need people. It ends by speaking of Aircraft where you dont even have to see, or know the people that you bomb and then about living a life in the twentieth century which he remarks is like a living death: leave him there. The steady rhythm of the poem also highlights the clean brutality of it all there is no speeding-up, no highlighting of death at any point. Brock uses a lot of neutral imagery in his poem. He even speaks of crucifixion and the man who has to nail the victim to the post as neutral: and a man to hammer the nails home. In this poem Brock speaks to the reader as if giving instruction, he does not speak personally at all about anything. T here if the victim who Just serves as the he in the poem and anyone else is Just referred to as a third person noun. This makes the poem very impersonal and makes sure that there is no connection between reader and victim which allows the poem to be read without emotion of any kind which could distort the meaning of the poem it is intended to show the loss of humanity (the loss of emotion) rather than describe vivid and terrifying images of war. This is not to say that he does not use strong imagery, he Just doesnt describe it in a terrifying way: a length of steel rather than a bloodied sword. This is opposed to Owens poem which is very personal, referring to the reader at various points such as If you could hear My friend, you would not It is also written in first person and directed at Journalists and other poets of the time who were writing about Joining the army, such as Jessie Pope who encouraged young men to Join the army, including Owen himself. Both poems aim to make the reader against the notion of war. In my personal opinion Brooks poem contributes to this cause better as it is written from a viewpoint which is far from war, which is what I am and thus I connect more with it. However other than with my own personal opinion I cannot compare these poems anymore as they are so different in delivery. Both achieve their purpose.

Overused LinkedIn Buzzwords of 2014 ... At Long Last!!

Overused LinkedIn Buzzwords of 2014 ... At Long Last!! The Power of  A  Single Word On Friday, I received two pieces of information that I would not normally put together into one blog, but they coincided too well to resist: 1. One of my clients, on the heels of an interview, wrote to me excitedly that the interviewer loved her resume- especially the word â€Å"unstoppable† in her summary section. The interviewer had never seen this word on a resume before. 2. LinkedIn came out with its list of Top Ten Global Buzzwords. Cautions LinkedIn: â€Å"Pledge to banish trite buzzwords [from your profile].† The article gives excellent advice on how to avoid using meaningless phrasing to describe yourself, as does my book, How to Write a KILLER LinkedIn Profile. I encourage you to read the article- and my book- for the tips they offer! Here’s the list of 2014s overused LinkedIn buzzwords: 1. Motivated 2. Passionate 3. Creative 4. Driven 5. Extensive experience 6. Responsible 7. Strategic 8. Track record 9. Organizational 10. Expert Are You Unstoppable? You might notice that â€Å"unstoppable†- the word that so impressed my client’s interviewer- is not on the list of LinkedIn buzzwords. It’s no coincidence that the word caught the attention of someone who probably goes through hundreds of resumes every week. I’m not advocating that you use the word â€Å"unstoppable† in your resume or LinkedIn profile, unless it is the absolute best adjective to describe you. I dont want to be â€Å"responsible for† adding â€Å"unstoppable† to next year’s list! Rather, I want you to find some language that doesn’t include the above trite words and phrases used by multitudes of LinkedIn users. (I’m willing to bet these are the words showing up most often on resumes too.) I also want you to comb through your resume and LinkedIn profile to see how many overused buzzwords show up. Then ask yourself how you can say things differently so that you don’t sound like everyone else. How  to Stand Out on LinkedIn Here’s a hint: Whereas anyone can claim to be motivated or creative, or to have a track record, not everyone can claim that they stepped into a competitive [insert type of] market and drove an organization from #2 to #1 worldwide, or that they conducted a multi-media campaign that increased a customer base by 500K. Whatever your achievements, get to the details and stop using the same words everyone else is using to â€Å"try† to sound good. It’s not working! Instead, use LinkedIn best practices for each section of your profile, especially your headline, job titles, special sections, skills expertise, and recommendations. That’s how you’ll call positive attention to what you have to offer. On a personal note, I must admit I’m saddened to see the word Expert on the buzzwords list, given that the word is in the name of my company. But that is something I’ll have to live with.

Senator Lamar Alexander Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Senator Lamar Alexander - Essay Example Lamar Alexander later served as Education Secretary under President George Bush. He ran unsuccessfully for the Presidency in 1996 and 1999, losing out to the GOP candidate Robert Dole in 1996 and George W Bush in 1999. Senator Lamar Alexander has generally voted with the majority of his Republican colleagues. But one of the issues that the Senator has been deeply concerned with is education. He has consistently provided support in the Senate for scientific research funding. During his tenure as Governor of Tennessee, he helped the State to become one of the first to reward its teachers and pay them more for better performance, while also ending tenure for bad teachers. He also supported a bill put forward in the Senate to provide an additional 10.2 billion dollars for federal education and Health and Human Services projects but has rejected other bills to provide more resources to local educational agencies and to community centers. He has proposed that parents be encouraged to create Education Savings Accounts in order to support the education of their children. On this issue therefore, he follows the line adopted by his own Party, where the effort is to make the available funding more productive in terms of what it is able to achieve. Where abortion and the family is concerned, he follows the line advocated by his party and opposes abortion, but has diverged from his Party line in his support for research carried out using stem cells derived from embryos, as demonstrated by his support for the Bill no: H.R. 810. Another important bill where he voted differently from the Republican Party was the bill H.R. 976, in which the Senate passed an expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which increased federal funding and provided health insurance for million uninsured American children.

High Risk Sexual Behavior with Incarcerated Youths Annotated Bibliography

High Risk Sexual Behavior with Incarcerated Youths - Annotated Bibliography Example On the whole, the work is well-written by qualified experts and will be useful for both clinicians and researchers in the field of STD The need to widen surveillance measures against STD among incarcerated youth has never been more crucial than now and the last few years because of statistics pointing out escalating rates of health problems among this group of adolescents. This is the rallying point of this article. The study is divided into 9 parts: abstract; the juvenile justice system; reasons for screening adolescent arrestees; substance use, sex, and other risk factors; organizational and structural barriers; policy and implementation issues; a promising model; conclusions and recommendations. The model of collaboration between the juvenile justice system and public health system, which was initiated as part of the study was fruitful. Related endeavors may pattern their model from the Belenko, et al. (2009) collaborative model. The authors demonstrated their expertise on the subject. The article is a review of recent developments the epidemiology of STD among incarcerated adolescents, as well as STD screening and interventions in juvenile correctional facilities. The generally high prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea even among incarcerated women was confirmed in this review and confirmed the authors’ position that screening of incarcerated adolescents in prison should be prioritized. Future research directions point towards the necessity to further examine the causes of the rise in the incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea.

Beyond the Common Myths of Hypnosis Essay examples -- essays research

â€Å"I shall use hypnosis to turn you into my slave!† roared Dr. Drake, as a bolt of lightening split the sinister sky behind him, to his defenseless victim who curled into a quivering ball at his fearful threat. This is a common theme in many horror movies involving hypnosis. Not only is â€Å"Dr. Drake† over-exaggerating on his statement, his declaration is simply ridiculous in the reality of hypnosis! It is essential to wipe out those common misconceptions of hypnosis encouraged by those fictional tales, and get down to the truth of hypnosis, its real power, its techniques, its role in the medical field, and its relationship with hypnotherapy. Sadly, an average person’s knowledge of hypnosis generally turns out to be common misconceptions promoted by the Medias and fictional books. One of the most popular misconceptions of hypnosis suggested that a hypnotized person naturally falls under the control of the hypnotist, which is completely false for he can only be hypnotized if he agrees to be. In some supernatural films, a hypnotized person is even portrayed to possess supernatural power under hypnosis. Once again, it holds no truth; hypnosis does not play a role in increasing or decreasing physical strength at all. As for those who have seen an adult subject remembering the details of his childhood toy, memory is not at all more accurate under hypnosis. The same guy who may be describing his childhood toy is still completely capable of lying to his hypnotist. Although he may be â€Å"reliving† his childhood while under hypnosis, most often the patient tends to go beyond the childhood stage and into their past life making it impossible to select a specific age in their stage of youth (Franzoi184). These are the most common misleading pieces of information on the abilities of hypnosis on its patient. Before going in depth on the true abilities of hypnosis, the origin of hypnosis must be unraveled. Going back almost 4000 years ago, hypnosis first originated in China, India, Egypt, Greece, Rome, and other ancient civilizations (Chaves 212). However, modern hypnosis traces more directly back to Franz Anton Mesmer, a German physician of 18th Century who â€Å"rediscovered and popularized hypnosis† (Smith 173). He believed that there was a â€Å"subtle fluid† that made up the universe including the human body. He concluded that when a person fell ill, whether emotionally or physica... ...ertain parts of hypnosis required to be used on a patient. While hypnosis can be used in many different ways, hypnotherapy focus mainly on strengthen an individual’s ability to cope with daily life. Obtaining the facts on the relationship between hypnotherapy and hypnosis was the hardest part of this research. I also learned the characteristics of hypnosis and the truth to the common misconceptions. I gained knowledge of the origin of hypnosis and its history. I also learned various methods of hypnotic induction and the facilitation of hypnosis in the society, although it would have been better if I could go deeper in depth on its techniques. I found out that self-hypnosis is possible and happen in one’s daily life, but I do wish that I had the chance to discuss of about its methods and techniques. In addition, I discovered that not everyone is susceptible to hypnosis; in fact, five to ten percent out of the whole population are unresponsive to hypnosis. This was ve ry surprising to me, for I had thought that everyone can be hypnotized in some ways. Through the process of writing this I-Search paper, I enjoyed replacing the old misconceptions of hypnosis with the new genuine facts.

Sharon Olds: from Psalms to Satan Says

Another common trait of confessional poetry is that the speaker will wear some form f mask to keep the author a small margin away from the speaker. While Olds doesn't create a mask directly, she never directly reveals that it is her in her many narrative poems. The confessional movement wasn't spurred by grand event but was strongly influenced by Sylvia Plant, Allen Ginsberg, and Robert Lowell. Olds TLD begin her work at the peak of the movement in the sass's and 1 ass's.While she did not have a part in the creation of the movement, she did carry on the movement into the present day. Poet: Sharon Olds is best known for her deeply personal content and her fearlessness tit vulgarities and the comfort with which she approaches sensitive subjects such as the dark side of family Interactions and sex. She Is driven to write by her philosophy shared in an Interview with Michael Lackey that If someone Is given the gift to write, that they should give that gift to the world.In that same inter view, Olds states that poetry should â€Å"get out there. † The events that likely created this poet were her childhood experiences that appear to be present in her writing. Analysis: In the loss-of-innocence poem, â€Å"l Go Back to May 1 937,† imagery is dominant. From he beginning, the imagery of the narrator's parents Is seemingly harmless. The father Is seen strolling under the arch of the college gate, leaving his college life behind him, not caring at all. The arch Is a large, proud structure symbolic of the father's large, proud nature.The father's face being described as arrogant, handsome, and blind is a kind of direct characterization; the narrator views the father as arrogant and blind. In contrast, the mother is seen standing still, not going anywhere. Holding books on her hip, she's holding on to the college, not yet ready to leave. The structure the mother Is standing In front of is made up of a multitude of small bricks, showing a delicate and complex n ature. The mother's face Is described as hungry, pretty, and blank. Hungry describes her want for more, be it marriage or to stay at the college.Blank is one of many methods Olds uses to describe the parents as naive and innocent. The parents are frequently described as innocent and incapable of knowing what their futures would hold. It almost appears that the narrator is excusing a crime not yet committed. Shortly after, the poem turns bleak In an Instant. In line 19, the chance for any good to come of the poem Is lost. The feeling of hopelessness that has set in as, despite all the pleading the narrator can muster, this is Just a memory and her cries fall silent.The tension grows until the narrator takes a turn for the violent when describing the striking together of the paper dolls, still taking responsibility away from the parents by implying they were powerless to the horrible things they would do. The poem ends in resignation as she give up her pleas and tells the parents to d o what they will do. In â€Å"1954,† Sharon Olds uses a frantic, fearful tone to describe the account of a onus girl hearing the media surrounding the Burton Abbott case, a murder and alleged molestation in California. The entirety of the poem circles around fear.From the very first line â€Å"The dirt scared me,† the narrator describes all of the things that cause her to be afraid surrounding the case. The flow of the poem is very rocky and awkward because of the broken sentences and enjambment of the lines. This creates a frantic mood, almost as if the narrator is speaking out of breath. The fear the narrator heaps on herself worsens with each connection she makes to the victim. The speaker connects her acne to the eczema on the victim who she feared was killed for not being flawless as suggested by the marked paper found on the body.The speaker describes Burton Abbott in plain words to stress his normal appearance. The narrator says that Abbott â€Å"took away what I'd thought I could count on about evil,† meaning that the narrator realizes that evil can manifest itself in any form, even the most innocent looking. Fear turns to pity when the narrator begins speaking of Abbot's execution. In the line â€Å"death to the person, death to the home planet,† Olds s protesting the eye-for-an-eye punishment that Abbott was to receive.